One of the greatest grumblings encompassing Apple's new MacBook Pro lineup is that the machines can't be redesigned past 16GB of RAM. This, alongside a couple of different reasons, has made something of a reaction among engineers and innovative experts who contend that Apple's new notebooks are overrated and under-fueled.
Despite the fact that Apple's 2017 MacBook Pro overhaul will apparently incorporate a value lessening and support for 32GB of RAM, and despite the fact that Apple's new laptops are supposedly offering like hotcakes, there remains a vocal minority of clients who still can't wrap their aggregate heads around the way that Apple, in 2016, would release a Pro level tablet with no redesign choice for 32GB of memory.As per BGR
In another trade that reveals some more insight into the matter, Apple official Phil Schiller as of late reacted to an engineering email looking for some clarity with respect to the current 16GB RAM restraint on Apple's new MacBook Pros, Macdaddy reported. Developing a past clarification he gave, Schiller says that Apple's fundamental objective was to expand battery life.
In a past email trade, Schiller said that increasing RAM support to 32GB "would require a memory framework that devours a great deal more power and wouldn't be sufficiently proficient for a notebook."
Macintosh's present MacBook Pros as of now utilize low power DDR3 RAM which can just go up to 16GB. Mac could have selected to utilize DDR4 RAM which can bolster 32GB, however past reports transfer that the Intel Skylake processors as of now found in Apple's MacBook Pros don't bolster low power DDR4 RAM.
As Reddit client called exploding_m1 clarified a couple of weeks back: "The genuine explanation for the absence of 32GB or DDR4 is Intel. Skylake does not bolster LPDDR4 (LP for low power) RAM. Kabylake is set to incorporate support, yet just for the U classification of chips. So no LPDDR4 bolster for mobile until 2018 I think."